United States v. Sheldon Dane Clark
United States v. Sheldon Dane Clark
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 05-11899 JUNE 30, 2006 Non-Argument Calendar THOMAS K. KAHN ________________________ CLERK D.C. Docket No. 04-00177-CR-J-25-HTS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus
SHELDON DANE CLARK, Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _________________________ (June 30, 2006) Before DUBINA, HULL and WILSON, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: Rodney G. Gregory, retained counsel for Sheldon Dane Clark in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Clark’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.