United States v. Fedencio J. Arellano
United States v. Fedencio J. Arellano
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JUNE 21, 2006 No. 05-16028 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK ________________________ D. C. Docket No. 05-00004-CR-FTM-29DNF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus FEDENCIO J. ARELLANO, Defendant-Appellant.
________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _________________________ (June 21, 2006) Before TJOFLAT, BIRCH and HILL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: David J. Joffe, counsel for Fedencio J. Arellano in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Arellano’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.