U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2006

United States v. Luis Miguel Porto-Carredo Estupinan

United States v. Luis Miguel Porto-Carredo Estupinan
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided June 7, 2006

United States v. Luis Miguel Porto-Carredo Estupinan

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT June 7, 2006 No. 05-16860 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK ________________________ D. C. Docket No. 00-00468-CR-T-17-MAP UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LUIS MIGUEL PORTO-CARREDO ESTUPINAN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _________________________ (June 7, 2006) Before CARNES, BARKETT and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: Luis Miguel Porto-Carredo Estupinan, pro se, appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3582(c), and/or 3742(a). Because Estupinan’s sentence was final when he filed his motion, the district court correctly determined that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the motion.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.