[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JUNE 5, 2006 No. 05-15738 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK ________________________ D. C. Docket No. 92-00043-CR-001 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LABARRON PENDLETON, a.k.a. Bright Eyes, a.k.a. Red, Defendant-Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _________________________ (June 5, 2006) Before TJOFLAT, DUBINA and WILSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: Latisha V. Colvin, appointed counsel for Labarron Pendleton, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the revocation of Pendleton’s supervised release and resulting sentence are AFFIRMED.