[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT July 18, 2006 No. 05-16593 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK ________________________ D. C. Docket No. 05-00016-CR-4-RH-WCS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CRAIG RUSSELL, Defendant-Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _________________________ (July 18, 2006) Before TJOFLAT, CARNES and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: This appeal presents one issue: whether supervised release standard condition No. 13 delegates a judicial function to the district court’s probation office. We resolved this issue in United States v. Nash, 438 F.3d 1302, 1306 (11th Cir. 2006).1 “Standard Condition Thirteen . . . does not improperly delegate a judicial function to a probation officer. . . .” Id. at 1306.

AFFIRMED.

The mandate in Nash issued on April 14, 2006.