United States v. Charles Floyd Gannon

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Charles Floyd Gannon

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED

________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

August 25, 2006

Nos. 06-11201 & 06-11455 THOMAS K. KAHN

Non-Argument Calendar CLERK

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 05-00146-CR-ORL-19-KRS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CHARLES FLOYD GANNON,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(August 25, 2006) Before TJOFLAT, PRYOR and FAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Stephen Langs, appointed counsel for Charles Gannon in these appeals from the revocation of Gannon’s supervised release term, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of these appeals is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the revocation of Gannon’s supervised release term and the resulting sentence are AFFIRMED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished