United States v. Charles Floyd Gannon
United States v. Charles Floyd Gannon
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT August 25, 2006 Nos. 06-11201 & 06-11455 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK ________________________ D. C. Docket No. 05-00146-CR-ORL-19-KRS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CHARLES FLOYD GANNON, Defendant-Appellant.
________________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _________________________ (August 25, 2006) Before TJOFLAT, PRYOR and FAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Stephen Langs, appointed counsel for Charles Gannon in these appeals from the revocation of Gannon’s supervised release term, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of these appeals is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the revocation of Gannon’s supervised release term and the resulting sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.