U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2006

United States v. James Ernest Luckie

United States v. James Ernest Luckie
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided August 9, 2006 · Tjoflat, Black, Barkett
192 F. App'x 877

United States v. James Ernest Luckie

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

E. Brian Lang, appointed counsel for James Ernest Luckie, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Luckie, because, in his opinion, the appeal is without merit. Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Luckie’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.