U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2006

United States v. Hinds

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided January 31, 2006 · Anderson, Dubina, Hull

164 F. App'x 934

Counsel

Abe Anselheart Bailey, Abe A. Bailey, P.A., Miami, FL, for Defendant-Appellant., Anne R. Schultz, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

United States v. Hinds (11th Cir. 2007)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

In this direct appeal, Hinds challenges only his sentence. In light of the Eleventh Circuit’s recent decision, United States v. Garcia, 405 F.3d 1260 (11th Cir. 2005), which was handed down after the decision of the district court, we vacate and remand Hinds’ sentence for the purpose of determining Garcia’s relevance, if any, to the instant case. We express no opinion on the merits of the issues in the case.

The judgment of conviction is AFFIRMED, but the sentence is VACATED and REMANDED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.