Hamall-Desai v. Fortis Benefits Insurance

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Hamall-Desai v. Fortis Benefits Insurance, 164 F. App'x 963 (11th Cir. 2006)

Hamall-Desai v. Fortis Benefits Insurance

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

AFFIRMED. See 11th Cir. R. 36-1.1

. 11th Cir. R. 36-1 provides:

When the court determines that any of the following circumstances exist:
(a) judgment of the district court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous;
(b) the evidence in support of a jury verdict is sufficient; (c) the order of an administrative agency is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole;
(d) summary judgment, directed verdict, or judgment on the pleadings is supported by the record;
(e) judgment has been entered without a reversible error of law; and an opinion would have no precedential value, the judgment or order may be affirmed or enforced without opinion.

Reference

Full Case Name
Eileen HAMALL-DESAI, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
Status
Published