U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2006

United States v. Ramirez

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided April 5, 2006

174 F. App'x 530

Counsel

Thomas H. Dale, Dale Law Firm, P.A., Orlando, FL, Kenneth Bruce Martin, Daniel F. Daly, Daly & Mills, P.A., Tampa, FL, Brent Davis Armstrong, Law Office of Brent D. Armstrong, Robert Tager, Rob-. ert M. Tager P.A., Clearwater, FL, for Defendants-Appellants., David Paul Rhodes, United States Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

United States v. Manuel Ramirez Garzon (11th Cir. 2007)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

The jurisdictional issue raised by appellants is foreclosed by our recent opinion in United States v. De La Cruz, 443 F.3d 830 (11th Cir. 2006). The other arguments of appellants challenging their convictions are rejected without need for further discussion.

Pursuant to the concession by the government, the sentences of all five appellants are vacated, and each is remanded for resentencing.

AFFIRMED as to the convictions; VACATED AND REMANDED as to the sentences.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.