U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2006

United States v. Pendleton

United States v. Pendleton
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided June 5, 2006 · Dubina, Tjoflat, Wilson
182 F. App'x 974

Counsel

Latisha Vánese Colvin, Carlos Alfredo Williams, Frederick W. Tiemann, Federal Defenders Office — Southern District of Alabama, Mobile, AL, for Defendant-Appellant., Elmond T. Rolison, Jr., Mobile, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

United States v. Pendleton

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Latisha V. Colvin, appointed counsel for Labarron Pendleton, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the revocation of Pendleton’s supervised release and resulting sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.