U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2006

United States v. Clark

United States v. Clark
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided June 30, 2006 · Dubina, Hull, Wilson
186 F. App'x 948

United States v. Clark

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Rodney G. Gregory, retained counsel for Sheldon Dane Clark in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Clark’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.