U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2006

United States v. Estupinan

United States v. Estupinan
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided June 7, 2006 · Barkett, Carnes, Pryor
187 F. App'x 914

United States v. Estupinan

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Luis Miguel Porto-Carrero Estupinan, pro se, appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3582(c), and/or 3742(a). Because Estupinan’s sentence was final when he filed his motion, the district court correctly determined that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the motion.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.