U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2006

United States v. Russell

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided July 18, 2006 · Carnes, Pryor, Tjoflat

189 F. App'x 932

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

This appeal presents one issue: whether supervised release standard condition No. 13 delegates a judicial function to the district court’s probation office. We resolved this issue in United, States v. Nash, 438 F.3d 1302, 1306 (11th Cir. 2006).1 “Standard Condition Thirteen ... does not improperly delegate a judicial function to a probation officer....” Id. at 1306.

AFFIRMED.

. The mandate in Nash issued on April 14, 2006.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.