Fernandez v. Silverstone Investments, Inc.
Fernandez v. Silverstone Investments, Inc.
203 F. App'x 291
Opinion of the Court
The district court denied appellant’s motion for judgment as a matter of law notwithstanding the jury’s verdict and alternative motion for a new trial on the issue of damages. The court denied the motion for judgment as a matter of law because the evidence did not point so overwhelmingly in favor of the plaintiff that a reasonable jury could not return a verdict for the defendants. After reviewing the relevant portions of the trial transcript, we agree with the district court and thus affirm its ruling.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.