United States v. Virgilio Antonio Rodrigez Pomare
United States v. Virgilio Antonio Rodrigez Pomare
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
JAN 12, 2007
No. 05-16939 THOMAS K. KAHN
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 05-00199-CR-T-30TBM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus VIRGILIO ANTONIO RODRIQUEZ POMARE,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(January 12, 2007) Before MARCUS, WILSON and PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
Scott Kalisch, counsel for Virgilio Antonio Rodriguez Pomare ("Rodriguez") in this direct appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Rodriguez’s convictions and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished