U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2007

United States v. Virgilio Antonio Rodrigez Pomare

United States v. Virgilio Antonio Rodrigez Pomare
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided January 12, 2007

United States v. Virgilio Antonio Rodrigez Pomare

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JAN 12, 2007 No. 05-16939 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK ________________________ D. C. Docket No. 05-00199-CR-T-30TBM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee, versus VIRGILIO ANTONIO RODRIQUEZ POMARE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _________________________ (January 12, 2007) Before MARCUS, WILSON and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: Scott Kalisch, counsel for Virgilio Antonio Rodriguez Pomare ("Rodriguez") in this direct appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Rodriguez’s convictions and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.