U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2007

United States v. James Herbert Cain

United States v. James Herbert Cain
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided January 11, 2007 · Tjoflat, Black, Hull
213 F. App'x 892

United States v. James Herbert Cain

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Kristen Gartman Rogers, counsel for James Hubert Cain in this appeal from his re-sentencing, which was mandated in United States v. Cain, 433 F.3d 1345 (11th Cir. 2005), when we affirmed his conviction and sentencing guideline calculation, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because we previously affirmed Cain’s conviction, and because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Cain’s sentence imposed by the district court on May 17, 2006, is AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.