Sheri Redeker-Barry appeals the district court’s May 30, 2006, order denying as moot her motion to “request a de novo determination of December 1, 2005, order denying Petition To Quash IRS Form 2039 Third-Party Summons,” and the denial of her motion for reconsideration requesting the district court reconsider the May 30, 2006, order. Though Redeker-Barry’s notice of appeal states she is appealing the magistrate judge’s May 24, June 5, and December 1, 2005, orders denying her motions to quash and for reconsideration, this Court only possesses jurisdiction to review *869 the district court’s orders denying her “motion to request a de novo determination” and final motion for reconsideration.

First, AmSouth’s compliance with the IRS summons did not render this case moot because the district court could have provided a partial remedy by ordering the IRS to destroy or return all copies of the documents produced by AmSouth. See Church of Scientology v. United States, 506 U.S. 9, 113 S.Ct. 447, 450, 121 L.Ed.2d 313 (1992). Accordingly, the district court erred in denying Redeker-Barry’s “motion for a de novo determination” as moot. Second, we have held that, where the legality of an IRS summons is at issue, a taxpayer has a minimal right to discovery which can be fulfilled through an evidentiary hearing at the district court. United States v. Harris, 628 F.2d 875, 881 (5th Cir. 1980). 1 The district court erred in denying Redeker-Barry the opportunity to conduct discovery before denying her “motion to request a de novo determination.” We vacate the denial of Redeker-Barry’s motion, and remand to the district court for discovery and consideration of whether the IRS summons of Redeker-Barry’s records from AmSouth should be quashed.

VACATED AND REMANDED.