U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2007

United States v. Viarquez Borden

United States v. Viarquez Borden
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided February 13, 2007 · Birch, Barkett, Wilson
217 F. App'x 873

United States v. Viarquez Borden

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Scott Kalisch, retained appellate counsel for Viarquez Borden, has filed a renewed motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). 1 Our independent re *874 view of the now complete record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Borden’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

1

. Kalisch previously filed a motion to withdraw, pursuant to Anders, which we denied without prejudice, but with leave to refile after he obtained the necessary transcripts to complete the record.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.