United States v. Lorenzo Sotelo-Camacho

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Lorenzo Sotelo-Camacho

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FILED

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

FEBRUARY 13, 2007

No. 05-16146 THOMAS K. KAHN

Non-Argument Calendar CLERK

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 99-00152-CR-01-JEC-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus LORENZO SOTELO-CAMACHO, a.k.a. Lorenzo Camacho, a.k.a. Lorenzo Sotelo,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

No. 05-16158

Non-Argument Calendar

_________________________

D.C. Docket No. 05-00040-CR-01-JEC-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus LORENZO SOTELO-CAMACHO,

Defendant-Appellant.

__________________________

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

_________________________

(February 13, 2007) Before BLACK, CARNES and MARCUS, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM:

Mary Erickson, appointed counsel for Lorenzo Sotelo-Camacho in this direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation of the appellant supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and

2 Sotelo-Camacho’s conviction, revocation of supervised release, and sentences are AFFIRMED.

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished