U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2007

United States v. Lorenzo Sotelo-Camacho

United States v. Lorenzo Sotelo-Camacho
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided February 13, 2007

United States v. Lorenzo Sotelo-Camacho

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FEBRUARY 13, 2007 No. 05-16146 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK ________________________ D. C. Docket No. 99-00152-CR-01-JEC-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LORENZO SOTELO-CAMACHO, a.k.a. Lorenzo Camacho, a.k.a. Lorenzo Sotelo, Defendant-Appellant.

________________________ No. 05-16158 Non-Argument Calendar _________________________ D.C. Docket No. 05-00040-CR-01-JEC-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LORENZO SOTELO-CAMACHO,

Defendant-Appellant.

__________________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _________________________ (February 13, 2007) Before BLACK, CARNES and MARCUS, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: Mary Erickson, appointed counsel for Lorenzo Sotelo-Camacho in this direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation of the appellant supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and

Sotelo-Camacho’s conviction, revocation of supervised release, and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.