United States v. Reginald Dewayne Hutcherson
Opinion
Joseph A. Ingram, appointed counsel for Reginald Dewayne Hutcherson in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Hutcherson’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED. We also construe Hutcherson’s response letter as a motion for appointment of new counsel and a motion for extension of time to file a response brief and DENY those motions.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Reginald Dewayne HUTCHERSON, A.K.A. Main Main, Defendant-Appellant
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Unpublished