U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2007

United States v. Pedro Enrique Serrano

United States v. Pedro Enrique Serrano
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided May 15, 2007 · Black, Marcus, Per Curiam, Pryor
224 F. App'x 943

United States v. Pedro Enrique Serrano

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Arthur Wallace, appointed counsel for Pedro Serrano, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Serrano’s conviction and sentence is AFFIRMED. However, we discovered a scrivener’s error in the judgment and, therefore, this case is REMANDED for the limited purpose of correcting the judgment so that it indicates that the statute of conviction was 21 U.S.C. § 846.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.