United States v. Richard Hinds
United States v. Richard Hinds
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JULY 12, 2007 No. 06-13569 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK ________________________ D. C. Docket No. 04-60072-CR-KAM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RICHARD HINDS, Defendant-Appellant.
________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _________________________ (July 12, 2007) Before WILSON, PRYOR and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Robin Farnsworth, counsel for Richard Hinds in this appeal from his re- sentencing, which was mandated in United States v. Hinds, case 05-11166 (11th Cir. January 31, 2006) (unpublished opinion), when we affirmed his conviction, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because we previously affirmed Hinds’s conviction, and because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Hinds’s sentence imposed by the district court on May 12, 2006, is AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.