United States v. Harvey Oliver Layne

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Harvey Oliver Layne

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FILED

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

JULY 3, 2007

No. 05-17128 THOMAS K. KAHN

Non-Argument Calendar CLERK

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 05-00084-CR-ORL-22KRS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus HARVEY OLIVER LAYNE, a.k.a. Tandin,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(July 3, 2007) Before ANDERSON, BIRCH and BARKETT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

J. Rafael Rodriguez, appointed counsel for Harvey Oliver Layne in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Layne’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished