United States v. Harvey Oliver Layne
United States v. Harvey Oliver Layne
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
JULY 3, 2007
No. 05-17128 THOMAS K. KAHN
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 05-00084-CR-ORL-22KRS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus HARVEY OLIVER LAYNE, a.k.a. Tandin,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(July 3, 2007) Before ANDERSON, BIRCH and BARKETT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
J. Rafael Rodriguez, appointed counsel for Harvey Oliver Layne in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Layne’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished