U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2007

United States v. Harvey Oliver Layne

United States v. Harvey Oliver Layne
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided July 3, 2007

United States v. Harvey Oliver Layne

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JULY 3, 2007 No. 05-17128 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK ________________________ D. C. Docket No. 05-00084-CR-ORL-22KRS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee, versus HARVEY OLIVER LAYNE, a.k.a. Tandin, Defendant-Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _________________________ (July 3, 2007) Before ANDERSON, BIRCH and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: J. Rafael Rodriguez, appointed counsel for Harvey Oliver Layne in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Layne’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.