United States v. Richard Nava
United States v. Richard Nava
243 F. App'x 587
United States v. Richard Nava
Opinion
Robert Ratliff, Esq., appointed counsel for Richard Nava, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals counsels’ assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, therefore, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Nava’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.