U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2007

United States v. Richard Nava

United States v. Richard Nava
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided September 27, 2007 · Tjoflat, Dubina, Carnes
243 F. App'x 587

United States v. Richard Nava

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Robert Ratliff, Esq., appointed counsel for Richard Nava, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals counsels’ assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, therefore, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Nava’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.