United States v. Nigel Gray
United States v. Nigel Gray
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED
________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
October 12, 2007
No. 07-11014 THOMAS K. KAHN
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 04-60131-CR-WPD UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus NIGEL GRAY,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
_________________________
(October 12, 2007) Before BLACK, MARCUS and PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
Nathan D. Clark, appointed counsel for Nigel Gray in this appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Gray’s sentence is AFFIRMED.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished