United States v. Nigel Gray

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Nigel Gray

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED

________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

October 12, 2007

No. 07-11014 THOMAS K. KAHN

Non-Argument Calendar CLERK

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 04-60131-CR-WPD UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus NIGEL GRAY,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

_________________________

(October 12, 2007) Before BLACK, MARCUS and PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Nathan D. Clark, appointed counsel for Nigel Gray in this appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Gray’s sentence is AFFIRMED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished