United States v. Nigel Gray
United States v. Nigel Gray
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT October 12, 2007 No. 07-11014 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK ________________________ D. C. Docket No. 04-60131-CR-WPD UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus NIGEL GRAY, Defendant-Appellant.
________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _________________________ (October 12, 2007) Before BLACK, MARCUS and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Nathan D. Clark, appointed counsel for Nigel Gray in this appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Gray’s sentence is AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.