U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2007

United States v. Michael D. James

United States v. Michael D. James
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided October 11, 2007 · Black, Marcus, Hill
250 F. App'x 939

United States v. Michael D. James

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Kristen Gartman Rogers, appointed counsel for Michael D. James in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and James’s revocation of supervised release and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.