United States v. Pomare
United States v. Pomare
213 F. App'x 901
United States v. Pomare
Opinion of the Court
Scott Kalisch, counsel for Virgilio Antonio Rodriguez Pomare (“Rodriguez”) in this direct appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Rodriguez’s convictions and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.