U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2007

United States v. Pomare

United States v. Pomare
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided January 12, 2007 · Marcus, Pryor, Wilson
213 F. App'x 901

United States v. Pomare

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Scott Kalisch, counsel for Virgilio Antonio Rodriguez Pomare (“Rodriguez”) in this direct appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Rodriguez’s convictions and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.