Doctor's Hospital Augusta v. Horton Homes, Inc.
Opinion of the Court
After oral argument and careful consideration, we conclude that the district court is due to be affirmed because plaintiff has not proved that the decision of the plan administrator was wrong. The evidence before the decision-maker clearly indicated that Candace was not “principally dependent” on her father, the covered employee.
Accordingly, the judgment of the district courtis
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- DOCTOR'S HOSPITAL AUGUSTA, Assignee of Candace A. Murray v. HORTON HOMES, INC., Defendant-Cross ACS Benefit Services, Inc., J. Smith Lanier and Co. Administrators, Inc., Defendants-Cross
- Status
- Published