U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2007

Molina v. United States

Molina v. United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided February 2, 2007 · Hull, Pryor, Wilson
216 F. App'x 828

Molina v. United States

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Olegario Pineda Molina, proceeding pro se, challenges the district court’s dismissal of his pro se motion to vacate his sentence, brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The district court dismissed Pineda Molina’s motion as time-barred, but granted a certificate of appealability (“COA”) as to the underlying constitutional claims raised in the motion. “When a district court dismisses a petition as time-barred, it is inappropriate to grant a COA on the constitutional claim.... ” Ross v. Moore, 246 F.3d 1299, 1300 (11th Cir. 2001) (involving petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254). Accordingly, we vacate the district court’s order granting a COA and remand the case to the district court for the limited purpose of considering whether a COA should be granted on the question of whether Pineda Molina’s § 2255 motion was time-barred.

VACATED AND REMANDED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.