Shane v. Humana, Inc.
Opinion of the Court
The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons set out in the district court’s order granting summary judgment, which was filed on June 19, 2006, except that we do not reach the issue of whether the “plus factors” requirement from antitrust law is applicable in civil RICO cases. Even if that requirement is not applicable, the district court’s judgment is still due to be affirmed under the facts and circumstances of this case.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Charles B. SHANE, M.D., Jeffrey Book, D.O., H. Robert Harrison, M.D., Glenn L. Kelly, M.D., Leonard J., Klay, M.D., Martin Moran, M.D., Manuel Porth, M.D., Thomas Backer, M.D., Susan Hansen, M.D., Andres Taleisnik, M.D., Julio Taleisnik, M.D., Roger Wilson, M.D., Medical Association of Georgia, Florida Medical Association, Louisiana State Medical Society v. HUMANA, INC., Coventry Health Care, Inc., Humana Health Plan, Inc., Pacificare Health Systems, Inc., Prudential Insurance Company of America
- Cited By
- 9 cases
- Status
- Published