We affirm the district court’s order of October 30, 2006, denying plaintiffs’ motion to compel arbitration. As the court properly found (for the reasons stated in its order), plaintiffs “failed to establish that a valid agreement to arbitrate exists with respect to either CHB or CEI.” We also affirm the court’s order of November 16, 2006, denying plaintiffs’ motion to alter or amend the October 30 order.

AFFIRMED.