United States v. William Earl Ervin, Jr.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
United States v. William Earl Ervin, Jr., 263 F. App'x 857 (11th Cir. 2008)
Birch, Dubina, Per Curiam, Wilson

United States v. William Earl Ervin, Jr.

Opinion

*858 PER CURIAM:

James L. O’Kelley, appointed counsel for William Earl Ervin, Jr., has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Ervin’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Earl ERVIN, Jr., Defendant-Appellant
Status
Unpublished