United States v. Sharon Sherman Hall

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Sharon Sherman Hall

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED

________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

September 12, 2008

No. 08-11321 THOMAS K. KAHN

Non-Argument Calendar CLERK

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 03-00060-CR-4-SPM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus SHARON SHERMAN HALL, a.k.a. Sharon P. Sherman,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Florida

_________________________

(September 12, 2008) Before BLACK, CARNES and PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Gwendolyn Spivey, appointed counsel for Sharon Sherman Hall, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent review of the entire record reveals no arguably meritorious issues, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s finding that Hall violated the terms of her supervised release, along with her modified monthly restitution payment amount, are AFFIRMED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished