United States v. Michael Muse

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Michael Muse

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FILED

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

SEPT 12, 2008

No. 08-10760 THOMAS K. KAHN

Non-Argument Calendar CLERK

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 07-00120-CR-1-MHS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MICHAEL MUSE,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

_________________________

September 12, 2008) Before ANDERSON, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Mary Erickson, appointed counsel for Michael Muse in this direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation of the appellant on the ground that the appeal has no arguable merit, and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Muse’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished