United States v. Taurus Brooks

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Taurus Brooks

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FILED

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

SEPT 10, 2008

No. 08-11076 THOMAS K. KAHN

Non-Argument Calendar CLERK

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 07-00020-CR-CAR-3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus TAURUS BROOKS,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Georgia

_________________________

(September 10, 2008) Before ANDERSON, HULL and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

John Philip Fox, appointed counsel for Taurus Brooks in this direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation of the appellant on the ground that the appeal has no arguable merit, and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Brooks’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished