United States v. Mario Melo

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
United States v. Mario Melo, 295 F. App'x 955 (11th Cir. 2008)

United States v. Mario Melo

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Neal Gary Rosensweig, counsel for Mario Meló, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because our independent review of the entire record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and Melo’s sentence following re-sentencing is AFFIRMED. We DENY as moot Melo’s motion to dismiss counsel on appeal, and we DENY Melo’s motions to dismiss his appeal and/or hold his appeal in abeyance.

Reference

Full Case Name
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mario MELO, Defendant-Appellant
Status
Unpublished