Diamond v. Sheriff of Broward County Sheriff's Office

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Diamond v. Sheriff of Broward County Sheriff's Office, 300 F. App'x 634 (11th Cir. 2008)

Diamond v. Sheriff of Broward County Sheriff's Office

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Michael Diamond appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action in favor of Alfred Lamberti, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Broward County Sheriffs Office (BSO), and BSO Officers Michael A. Corbett and James M. Garrison. Specifically, Diamond asserts there is a genuine issue of material fact as to whether Corbett and Garrison deprived Diamond of his right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure under the Fourth Amendment, and that Corbett and Garrison are not entitled to quali *635 fied immunity. Diamond further asserts the policies and procedures of BSO allowed for activities by its police officers which violated the Fourth Amendment rights of Diamond and that BSO’s failure to properly train and superase its officers resulted in the violation of Diamond’s Fourth Amendment rights.

After review of the record and the parties’ briefs, we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s well-reasoned Order on Motions for Summary Judgment entered on April 1, 2008.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Michael DIAMOND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SHERIFF OF BROWARD COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, Al Lamberti, in His Official Capacity, Michael A. Corbett, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
Status
Unpublished