U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2008

United States v. Cedric Lamar Jackson

United States v. Cedric Lamar Jackson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided December 17, 2008 · Anderson, Pryor, Hill
303 F. App'x 749

United States v. Cedric Lamar Jackson

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Stuart M. Mones, retained counsel for Cedric Lamar Jackson in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Jackson’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Jackson’s “Motion Seeking Enlargement of Time to File Supplemental/Amended Appellate Brief and Obtain New[] Appointment of Counsel” is DENIED.

Jackson’s “Motion for Appointment of Counsel” is DENIED AS MOOT.

The government’s “Motion to Dismiss Based on Waiver of Appeal” is DENIED AS MOOT.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.