As the prevailing party in this action, Nova Southeastern University, Inc. (Nova) appeals the district court’s denial of its request for attorneys’ fees under the American with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12205, and the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 794a(b). Nova contends the district court abused its discretion in denying Nova’s motion for attorneys’ fees because: (1) Scott Hirsch litigated his claims in bad faith, and (2) Hirsch’s claims were frivolous and unreasonable ab initio.

We have thoroughly reviewed the record and the briefs in this case and find no abuse of discretion by the district court. We affirm for the reasons set forth in the magistrate judge’s well-reasoned order of March 3, 2006. 1

AFFIRMED.