United States v. Brooks
United States v. Brooks
291 F. App'x 983
United States v. Brooks
Opinion of the Court
John Philip Fox, appointed counsel for Taui'us Brooks in this direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation of the appellant on the ground that the appeal has no arguable merit, and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.