U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2008

United States v. Brooks

United States v. Brooks
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided September 10, 2008
291 F. App'x 983

United States v. Brooks

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

John Philip Fox, appointed counsel for Taui'us Brooks in this direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation of the appellant on the ground that the appeal has no arguable merit, and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. *984Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Brooks’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.