U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2008

United States v. Muse

United States v. Muse
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided September 12, 2008
292 F. App'x 862

United States v. Muse

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Mary Erickson, appointed counsel for Michael Muse in this direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation of the appellant on the ground that the appeal has no arguable merit, and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Muse’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.