U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2009

United States v. Michael Orange

United States v. Michael Orange
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided April 28, 2009 · Marcus, Pryor, Anderson
325 F. App'x 804

United States v. Michael Orange

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Robert F. Clark, appointed counsel for Michael Orange in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant because, in his opinion, the appeal is without merit. Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Orange’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.