U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2009

United States v. Ronald Ray Langdon

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided April 10, 2009 · Birch, Pryor, Cox

322 F. App'x 888

Counsel

Ronald Ray Langdon, Herlong, CA, pro se., Michelle Thresher Taylor, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Ap-pellee.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

United States v. Ronald Ray Langdon (11th Cir. 2010)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

*889 PER CURIAM:

James W. Smith, III, appointed counsel for Ronald Ray Langdon, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s order denying Langdon’s motion for relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) is AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.