Florists' Mutual Ins. Co. v. Lewis Taylor Farms
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________
FILED No. 08-13922 U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
APRIL 2, 2009 THOMAS K. KAHN
D. C. Docket No. 05-00050-CV-HL-7 CLERK
FLORISTS’ MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, QUALITY PRODUCE, LLC,
Plaintiffs-Appellees, LEWIS TAYLOR FARMS, INC., LTF GREENHOUSE, LLC,
Plaintiffs-Cross- Defendants-Appellees, versus
DL&B ENTERPRISES, INC.,
Defendant-Third-Party- Cross-Claimant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia _________________________
(April 2, 2009)
Before TJOFLAT and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges, and WOOD,* District Judge. PER CURIAM:
We have held oral argument and carefully considered this case. We agree with the district court that the case presents a close question as to whether DL&B bought goods from LTF, or bought services. We do not reach that issue. Rather, we affirm the judgment of the district court on the basis of the district court’s alternative holding that the damages were speculative. The control field upon which DL&B relies simply does not meet the standard required under Georgia law to prove damages.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.