U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2009

United States v. Preston Lamar Williams

United States v. Preston Lamar Williams
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided May 28, 2009 · Black, Pryor, Hill
325 F. App'x 903

United States v. Preston Lamar Williams

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Leonard E. Clark, appointed counsel for Preston Lamar Williams in this appeal from the district court’s denial of Williams’s motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s denial of relief under § 3582(c)(2) is AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.