U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2009

United States v. Dustin Nathaniel Miller

United States v. Dustin Nathaniel Miller
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided May 7, 2009 · Birch, Hull, Hill
325 F. App'x 872

United States v. Dustin Nathaniel Miller

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Richard Earl Shields, appointed counsel for Dustin Miller in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Miller’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.